Ghai Law Firm
Call for a free consultation:
(770) 792-1000
  • ABOUT
    • Testimonials
    • Join Us
  • Practice Areas
    • Personal Injury
      • Pedestrian Accident
      • Car Accidents
        • Speeding Accident
        • Drinking and Driving Accidents
        • Left Hand Turn Accident
        • Rear-End Collision
        • Reckless Driving Accident
        • Uber Accidents
        • Hit-and-Run Accidents
        • Texting and Driving Accident
          • Texting and Driving Under 18
      • Truck Accident
        • Lane Usage Accident
        • Traumatic Brain Injury
      • Product Liability
        • Defective Drugs
        • Defective Medical Device
      • Premises Liability
        • Slip and Fall Accidents
      • Wrongful Death
      • Dog Bite
    • Bankruptcy
      • Debt Relief
      • Credit Card Debt
      • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
      • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
      • Foreclosure Bankruptcy
      • Free Legal Case Review
      • Medical Bills Bankruptcy
      • Rebuild Your Credit
      • Wage Garnishments
  • Areas We Serve
    • Kennesaw Personal Injury Lawyer
      • Kennesaw Bankruptcy Lawyer
    • Acworth Personal Injury Lawyer
      • Acworth Bankruptcy Lawyer
    • Marietta Personal Injury Lawyer
      • Marietta Bankruptcy Lawyer
    • Smyrna Personal Injury Lawyer
  • FAQs
  • Blog
  • Videos
  • Contact

Court Rules Both Spouses Entitled To Tax Refund

Home » Court Rules Both Spouses Entitled To Tax Refund

 

IN RE: TRINA LYN BAKER, Debtor.

Bankruptcy Case No. 11-92003

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Dated: July 2, 2012

 

 

______________
Gerald D. Fines
United States Bankruptcy Judge

OPINION

This matter having come before the Court on a Motion to Compel filed by the Chapter 7 Trustee; the Court, having heard arguments of counsel and reviewed written memoranda of law filed by the parties and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Rule 7052 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.

Findings of Fact

The material facts in this matter are not in dispute and are, in pertinent part, as follows:

  1. The Debtor, Trina Lyn Baker, filed for relief under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 1, 2011. Debtor’s Section 341 Meeting of Creditors was held on December

Page 2

21, 2011, at which time the Trustee requested a copy of the Debtor’s 2011 Federal and State income tax returns.

  1. On December 30, 2011, the Trustee filed a Notice of Intent and a Motion for Turnover with regard to the Debtor’s 2011 income tax returns and refunds. Additionally, correspondence was sent to the Debtor reminding her that she should not cash any tax refund and that any refund that she would receive should be turned over to the Chapter 7 Trustee.
  2. On February 3, 2012, the Trustee contacted Debtor’s counsel inquiring about the copies of the 2011 Federal and State income tax returns and any refunds that may have been received. The Trustee received no response to this correspondence.
  3. On February 9, 2012, a hearing was held on the Trustee’s Motion for Turnover and the Debtor was ordered to turn over copies of her State and Federal income tax returns for the year 2011, together with any non-exempt portion of her tax refunds. A written order was entered on February 14, 2012, on the Trustee’s Motion for Turnover.
  4. On March 24, 2012, the Trustee received copies of the Debtor’s State and Federal income tax returns showing that the Debtor had filed joint returns with her husband, David Baker. After all applicable credits, the State and Federal tax returns for the year 2011 reflected that the Debtor had non-exempt refunds in the amount of $7,129. It is the Trustee’s position that the Debtor’s share of those refunds is $3,564.50, and that that amount should be turned over to the Trustee.
  5. It is the Debtor’s position that the Debtor’s husband, David Baker, was the only source of taxable income during the year of 2011, and that, as such, no portion of the 2011 tax refunds should be turned over as property of the Debtor’s bankruptcy estate.
  6. On April 24, 2012, the Chapter 7 Trustee sent Debtor’s counsel a letter again requesting turnover of the funds and advising Debtor’s counsel that a letter had also been sent to the Debtor’s residence regarding the tax refunds. There was no response to either letter sent by

Page 3

the Chapter 7 Trustee. As a result, the Chapter 7 Trustee filed the instant Motion to Compel on May 21, 2012.

  1. A hearing was held on June 14, 2012, at which time the parties were given 14 days to file written memorandum of law outlining their positions in this matter.

Conclusions of Law

The Court has reviewed the written memoranda of law filed by the parties and finds that the only reported decision in the Seventh Circuit concerning this issue is In re Innis, 331 B.R. 784 (Bankr. C.D. Ill. 2005), in which Judge Perkins held that:

. . . where a debtor and a non-debtor spouse file a joint tax return, any refund is presumptively jointly owned in equal portion by each spouse, so that one half of the refund becomes property of the debtor spouse’s bankruptcy estate. This presumption is subject to rebuttal by proof of a court order enforceable between the spouses or by proof of a prenuptial or other written prepetition agreement of the parties that provides for a different allocation of ownership of the refund. See: Innis, supra, at 790.

For a free legal consultation, call (770) 792-1000

The Debtor asserts that Judge Perkins’ approach taken in Innis is inappropriate and in response cites case authority from other jurisdictions outlining two different approaches taken where joint income tax refunds are at issue. This Court has carefully reviewed the authorities cited by the Debtor and the Innis Opinion and finds that it fully agrees with the position taken by Judge Perkins in Innis finding that joint tax refunds are jointly owned in an equal portion by each spouse and, therefore, half of the refund becomes property of the debtor spouse’s bankruptcy estate pursuant to the provisions of 11 U.S.C. § 541(a)(1). This Court is unpersuaded by the authorities cited from other jurisdictions, and finds that a reading of 11 U.S.C. § 541 and of Judge Perkins’ cogent opinion in Innis supports the position taken by the Chapter 7 Trustee in this case. As such, the Court finds that the Motion to Compel filed by the Chapter 7 Trustee should be allowed with the Debtor being ordered to turn over the sum of $3,564.50.

Call or text (770) 792-1000 or complete a Free Case Evaluation form

Bankruptcy Blog Posts:

Bankruptcy Filings Continuing To Rise In 2010

Due to high unemployment and an uncertain economic climate, consumer bankruptcy filings in America have increased in 2010. According to statistics reported by the American Bankruptcy Institute, a

Chapter 7 Bankruptcy and Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Comparison

Good Morning, this is Roger Ghai of www.Chapter7attorneys.com. I wanted to do a little informational video on bankruptcy options. In particular, Chapter 7 bankruptcy options and Chapter 13 bankruptcy

Filing Chapter 7 Bankruptcy – January 2010 Talk Law Radio Show Transcript

Janice: Good afternoon Atlanta and welcome to News & Talk 1380 WAOK. This is Janice Mathis and we’re here this afternoon and every Sat. afternoon at 1pm to talk with one of our lawyers who’s

Difference Between Chapter 13 & Chapter 7 Bankruptcy – March 2010 Talk Law Radio Show Transcript

Janice: Good afternoon Atlanta and welcome to Legal Talk. This is Janice Mathis. This is my favorite hour of the weekend. I learn something new every weekend talking to these brilliant lawyers we have

Bankruptcy FAQ:

Bankruptcy FAQ
Bankruptcy FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions: Table of Contents Who is permitted to file and maintain a chapter 7 case? Who should not file a Chapter 7 case? Is there anything that a person must do

Can Creditors Be Sued For Trying To Collect Debt After You File For Bankruptcy
Can Creditors Be Sued For Trying To Collect Debt After You File For Bankruptcy

The injunction is formally issued pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 362(a), commonly referred to as the Automatic Stay provision of the bankruptcy code, and it prohibits creditors from making further attempts to

Can Your Home Be Sold In Bankruptcy If You Don’t File Bankruptcy But Your Spouse Files Bankruptcy?
Can Your Home Be Sold In Bankruptcy If You Don’t File Bankruptcy But Your Spouse Files Bankruptcy?

In a recent case, In re Beck Mrs. Beck filed for bankruptcy protection but her husband did not. Together they owned a property which was valued at about $530,000.00. The property had actually been in

Can You Claim A Homestead Exemption In A Home You Do Not Live In?
Can You Claim A Homestead Exemption In A Home You Do Not Live In?

The Chapter 7 trustee objected to Mrs. Goulakos’s claim of exemption because she did not live in the house and because she was not the one who claimed the homestead exemption under Massachusetts

Free Case Evaluation

Convenient and Confidential

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Bankruptcy FAQ

    Bankruptcy FAQ

    Can You Keep Your House If You File For Chapter 7 Bankruptcy?

    Can You Keep Your House If You File For Chapter 7 Bankruptcy?

    Can Creditors Be Sued For Trying To Collect Debt After You File For Bankruptcy

    Can Creditors Be Sued For Trying To Collect Debt After You File For Bankruptcy

    Let Ghai Law Fight For You.

    We’re here to provide help when you need us. Fill out this form below and I’ll reach out to discuss your case.

      Ghai Law Firm
      Call for a free consultation:
      (770) 792-1000

      Office Location

      LAW OFFICES OF ROGER GHAI

      1301 SHILOH RD NW STE 430

      KENNESAW GA   30144

      Mon-Fri: 9AM - 6PM

      Important Links

      • About
      • Practice Areas
      • Areas We Serve
      • Contact

      Practice Areas

      Personal Injury Lawyer Bankruptcy Attorney

      Ghai Law Firm

      Cobb County, Marietta, Kennesaw, Acworth

      "The Attorney"

      Site Map
      © Copyright 2023 Law Offices of Roger Ghai
      • ABOUT
        • Testimonials
        • Join Us
      • Practice Areas
        • Personal Injury
          • Pedestrian Accident
          • Car Accidents
            • Speeding Accident
            • Drinking and Driving Accidents
            • Left Hand Turn Accident
            • Rear-End Collision
            • Reckless Driving Accident
            • Uber Accidents
            • Hit-and-Run Accidents
            • Texting and Driving Accident
              • Texting and Driving Under 18
          • Truck Accident
            • Lane Usage Accident
            • Traumatic Brain Injury
          • Product Liability
            • Defective Drugs
            • Defective Medical Device
          • Premises Liability
            • Slip and Fall Accidents
          • Wrongful Death
          • Dog Bite
        • Bankruptcy
          • Debt Relief
          • Credit Card Debt
          • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
          • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
          • Foreclosure Bankruptcy
          • Free Legal Case Review
          • Medical Bills Bankruptcy
          • Rebuild Your Credit
          • Wage Garnishments
      • Areas We Serve
        • Kennesaw Personal Injury Lawyer
          • Kennesaw Bankruptcy Lawyer
        • Acworth Personal Injury Lawyer
          • Acworth Bankruptcy Lawyer
        • Marietta Personal Injury Lawyer
          • Marietta Bankruptcy Lawyer
        • Smyrna Personal Injury Lawyer
      • FAQs
      • Blog
      • Videos
      • Contact